Architecture of yesterday announced AmLogic AML8726-MX CPU is now revealed a bit more.
AmLogic AML8726-MX CPU architecture
CPU part is (as you may expect), double of AML8726-M (Cortex-A9) ARM core. Amlogic annouced 7500 DMIPS, from which fact we have deducted 1,5GHz operational frequency:
7500 DMIPS / 2 cores / 2,5 DMIPS per MHz = 1,5Ghz
But what about graphics? We already speculated about GPU: Now its confirmed, there are two Mali-400 GPU cores inside, operating at 300-400 MHz, giving this chip power up to 88 Mtriangles/s 44 Mtriangles/s and fill rate 3.2 GPixels/s 800 MPixel/s. (apologize, I did not noticed that 800 MPixels mentioned in Mali400MP specifications on ARM website is not for one core, but for 4-core config @200MHz).
Just compare those figures with iPad GPU performance:
- iPad: PowerVR SGX535 … 28 MTri/s, 500MP/s
- iPad2 PowerVR SGX543MP2 … 70 MTri/s, 2000MP/s
- new iPad: PowerVR SGX543MP4 … 140 MTri/s, 4000MP/s
- a tablet with AML8726-MX: dual Mali-400MP@400MHz… 44 MTri/s, 800MP/s
- a tablet with Rockchip RK3066: quad Mali-400MP@266MHz … 30MTri/s, 1066MP/s
Please, realize that new iPad has 4-times more pixels to work with, which is huge amount of work for GPU (and cause of new iPad overheating issues) . For displays used in 7″ tablets (mostly 1024×600 and sometimes just 800×480), 1Gpixel/s is more than enough to bring very good graphical and game performance.
Pingback: Ainol Aurora II tablet with dual-core AmLogic AML8726-MX confirmed | Tom Kaňok
Pingback: Google Nexus tablet: Asus or Samsung? | ARM Inside – about Android devices
Pingback: amlogic 8726-m 6 Dual oder Singel Core??? - Android-Hilfe.de
Pingback: Anonymous
Pingback: Rockchip 3066 vs Amlogic 8726-MX
Pingback: Rockchip 3066 vs Amlogic 8726-MX | Blog Android
If 4*200Mhz = 88 Mtriangles/s & 3.2 GPixels/s, 2* 400Mhz, should be about the same ;).
The base after Lima driver tests, is about 1pixel/processor/clock/s with limitation when vertex count capacity is reached, so very approximativly and really ”theorically” 2*400M = 8GPixels/s => 3.2 seems to be a good value in practice with bus/ram… limitation but no good reason to divide by 3 a 2* 400 MHz vs a 4* 200MHz version.
Oops sorry 8 MP for 4core@200MHz so 8MP for 2core@400MHz, OK 🙂
800MP, not 8MP.
Pingback: ONDA V701双核版を殻割りしました | 徒労日記
Pingback: Topic Kickstarter - Segnaliamo i progetti interessanti - - Page 3 - Il Forum ufficiale di Multiplayer.it, con discussioni, sondaggi e le ultime informazioni
I love it when folks get together and share opinions. Great site, continue the good work!
Seems pretty underspecced comparing it to high end Android phones/tablets.
Even compared to mid end gadgets nowdays remains as low end, sadly, december 2013, and this are still being used on new products.
Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.Thanks Again. Really Cool. bfekdegbegcd